• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Hear Me Out! [CC]

Bridging the Gap Between the Hearing & Deaf Worlds

  • Home
  • Services
    • Power Hour
    • Hire Me to Speak
  • Join & Support
  • Blog
    • Hearing Aids
    • Sign Language
    • Subitles/Captions
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Interviews
    • Personal
    • Reviews
    • View All Posts
  • My Story
  • Contact

My reactions to Twitter’s new audio tweet feature

June 24, 2020 By Ahmed Khalifa

As a way to be innovative and introduce new features, Twitter has decided to rollout a new audio tweet feature to set group of iOS users to allow another way to express your voice if 280 characters are not enough.

But it didn’t go according to plan when the deaf and hard of hearing community expressed their frustration about its lack of accessibility, which prompted various individuals within the company to release their own statements.

Long story short, they messed up.

I have decided to give my own thoughts on what happened and what they, and many companies, could have done better.

You can do that by watching the video below…

…listen to the podcast…

…read the transcript.


Last week on 17th of June 2020, Twitter has rolled out a feature called ‘audio tweet’, something like that, and they rolled out to test it on a few people on iOS.

It’s a new feature that they want to push out there it seems and basically on their blog post that they have entitled “Your tweet, your voice”, they have said that “sometimes 280 characters aren’t enough and some conversational nuances arelost in translation.”…

Don’t we know it.

“…So starting today we are testing a new feature that will add a more human touch to the way we use Twitter; your own voice”.

Screenshot of Twitter's blog post entitled 'Your Tweet, your voice'
Twitter’s post about this new feature – Source: Twitter Blog

The way it works is that you record your voice on the file, on the app and then it will attach to a tweet. You write your message, you see a wave form of audio file there and you can read the message and then press play on the audio file on that tweet itself.

It lasts around 140 seconds but if you have more to stay, and some of us, talk too much, then you can get keep on talking and it will create like an audio tweet thread.

So the idea sounds nice, doesn’t it? it sound like a nice feature you get lost in translation less often and maybe just something that people would like you know add a bit more human touch to it.

What could possibly go wrong?

Well I tell you what’s gone wrong…I can’t hear it! Before we go into the topic make sure you check out my Patreon page if you do fancy supporting the channel for as little as $3 dollars a month. That’s it.

Support Hear Me Out! [CC] via Patreon

It will only cost you from $3 a month

Learn more about becoming a Patreon here

This will help me to make sure that I can continue creating content like this and to bridge the gap between deaf and hearing people and just share the good stuff that I have as many people as possible.

Straightaway, when they have announced that, what I was looking for is some information about how am I going to access that information because I’m not going to be able to hear it, and there doesn’t seem to be any way of accessing that content, which means they are accessible for people like me and many many other people.

And because of that, people were not happy. I was one of them. I got very frustrated when I saw that and I did not like that feature one bit. So basically I just tweeted out saying “great, another content that is inaccessible as well on the Internet. That’s what we need…more of them”.

Screenshot of Ahmed's retweeted comment about Twitter Support's audio tweet announcement where he tweeted: "Oh great, more ways for many of us to not be able to access content [sad emoji tweet]
Source: Twitter.com

And it’s not just me who has expressed their frustration. So many people have spoken up about it and so many people could not believe why would you release something like this and not have it accessible in a certain way, whether transcript or captions, you know encouraging people do that.

Nothing! Absolutely nothing!

People have spoken up especially deaf people, they have spoken up on Twitter, and man there was a bit of an outcry about that and people just didn’t like it. They give expressed their annoyance and frustration, and it’s something that happens again and again and again.

They are left behind or people who are not able to access that information or don’t have the accessibility requirement met, they are left behind they’re pushed aside, because it’s deemed not important.

So people get frustrated and you can imagine that’s how I feel and how they feel because it’s again, we are being ignored. And because of that, a few people on Twitter have decided to speak up, which is amazing, really really good of him.

Twitter have spoken up about their mistakes

Two people in particular have spoken up, one of them is part of the product design team, Maya Patterson, and she released an audio tweet thread but also the transcript, very nice, and she basically put her own personal response to the deaf and hard of hearing community.

I would advise you to check out that Twitter thread by clicking on the link in the captions below:

Screenshot of Twitter employee Maya Patterson's audio tweet with the first tweet thread reads "My personal response to the Deaf/HOH Community:   Uh point blank period, we fucked up, I fucked up. Uh we launched a test and we should have included accessibility features in that test. That was a huge error, and one I personally have made myself sit [cont]"
You can read or listen to the rest of the thread here

But basically, the long story short is that she realises that it’s just not right. She didn’t think about those things. She didn’t think about the feature that will be necessary, like accessibility requirement. She listened.

She said “you know what this is not right I want to fix it, I want to do it right” and she felt bad about that and she apologised for it as well and it seemed quite a genuine. It seemed quite honest. I was quite impressed with that.

And I responded saying “I appreciate what you are saying, I really do”. Also I wanted to say it’s not her fault directly because she had to work in that system.

Ahmed's reply to Maya's audio tweet thread "I respect you for coming out with this Maya. I don't blame you directly, but more on the system in place which has created this issue.  I'm looking forward to see what's going to happen next."
Source: Twitter.com

Another person within Twitter I think his name is Dantley Davis, and he’s the head of design. And he also apologised and he made it clear that “we should have accessibility from a beginning of all projects” and he wants to do something about it.

And that tweet has also been supported by the ‘Twitter Support’ Twitter account if you like and they have also expressed their frustration as well and they listened up and they said “you know what, we messed up, we hear you we want to do something about it”.

Twitter Support retweeted comment: "We're sorry about testing voice Tweets without support for people who are visually impaired, deaf, or hard of hearing. It was a miss to introduce this experiment without this support.   Accessibility should not be an afterthought. (1/3)" while Dantley's tweet states "I appreciate the feedback and direct conversation about #a11y from our passionate community. It's clear we have a lot of work ahead to make Twitter more inclusive for people with disabilities. I will advocate for a11y to be part of our design from the beginning of all projects."
Twitter Support and Dantley Davis have both expressed their apology – Source: Twitter.com

It’s great to see that people spoke up and people should do it more often and I’m glad they have have spoken up. And one thing that I wanted to clarify with both of them and people who in that similar situation is that I’m not blaming the individuals concerned. I’m not blaming them directly, because I blame the system more on Twitter.

Whatever system they have in place, they have to work in that system and they just have to go with it and if that’s their system and they can’t really change you or they can’t go around it or can’t make it better, then we can’t blame the individual concerned. We should be looking at the system in place on Twitter.

Why accessibility is not an important part of their team? Why is not thought off from the beginning?

It seemed to be ignored. It’s not the first time they’ve done that. They’ve done it time and time again.

Twitter seemingly doesn’t have accessibility expert?

When reading more about it I have also found out that the Twitter accessibility relies on employees who volunteered their time. That’s according to one of the engineer working and basically what he’s saying is that “we have this thing where we have employees do their thing and then in their spare time they do a bit of accessibility”.

Andrew Hayward (Twitter engineer) tweeted: "The volunteers behind accessibility at Twitter (there is no formal team) strive to do their best to ensure products are shipped appropriately. Unfortunately though, we aren't aware of every product decision, and the wider #a11y conversation is ongoing. Just to clarify, given that this seems to have gained some traction... we are volunteers in so much as the work we do is notionally on top of our regular roles, rather than being full time.  We are all otherwise paid employees - Twitter is not outsourcing unpaid labour!"
Another member of the Twitter team had to speak out – Source: Twiter.com

So it’s not something that they specialise in. It’s just a little extra thing that they do, whatever free time that they have on their normal job, which is mind-boggling. I’m so baffled by that.

What they are saying is they don’t have a dedicated accessibility team, which is ridiculous as far as I’m concerned.

There are so many people out there they have spoken up, they are the accessibility experts, the advocate, the people who know these stuff and they have shout out about it from the roof top “why do you not have this from a beginning…why do you not have the team in place”…all of these things.

But what didn’t have it and it’s just so weird because you think it’s a normal thing to have for any major company, any major software company to incorporate that and think about doing that before releasing anything new. But they didn’t do that.

It’s not the first time that Twitter ran into accessibility problem. Most other social media platforms, they allow you to upload caption to the videos.

But Twitter don’t, at least they don’t do anymore, because a few days after this whole thing about the audio tweet, suddenly they have seemed to have enabled the option of uploading captions to video to everyone.

Screenshot of Ahmed' retweeted comment of another person's tweet who written "I'll be damned! Twitter seems to have enabled Media Studio for all users, allowing EVERYONE to add captions to their videos!. Ahmed's tweet "Well this a turn of event after last week's audio tweet fiasco [suprised face emoji]"
Source: Twitter.com

From what I understand, it seemed to be that they have just allowed that features to certain people. They allow the option of caption to be uploaded to videos were only available to certain people and then suddenly it’s available to everyone.

First of all why now? I find that a bit suspicious, especially after people spoke up. But also, why the hell would you just allow the feature to be only available to certain people. That should be available to everyone. Absolutely everyone should have that feature but for some reason it didn’t work like that.

Again, it seemed like a common sense in like a basic accessibility thing to have.

My suggestions for Twitter

After things up settle down, it seems that they’re going to relook at how to make it more accessible and I understand that they’re going to see about their whole system on how to make sure that accessibility is mentioned and thought of at the beginning of any projects, all projects.

But for this audio treat in particular, they’re looking into what can they do about it and I’m really curious to see what happens with that. And if I hear more, I will update it in the transcript.

One of my suggestion is to make it as easy as possible for people to have captions because I know that people won’t do it voluntarily, especially if there are barriers in front of them.

Sometimes people don’t give a damn, they just can’t be arsed. So they are just going to leave it aside or they’ll think about it later or just ignore it…all these things. And it’s important to make sure that captions are done as easy as possible. But that’s not always the case for some people. They just can’t be bothered.

You only have to look at YouTube and how terrible most of videos are in terms of their captions because people just leave it on auto-caption instead of either uploading a new one or editing the auto-caption, which brings me to one of my suggestions for Twitter is to allow auto-captions but allow people to edit the auto-caption so that they can upload it to that audio tweet.

The same thing applies for the videos. At the moment that option is not there for a video and it’s not there for their early version of the audio tweet. That’s something that they can think about.

Accessibility is a must from the beginning

The general moral of a story is that accessibility should be something that is thought of from the very, very beginning.

Because I’ve got news for you:

  • Accessibility is not an afterthought.
  • Accessibility is not a luxury.
  • Accessibility is not a “nice-to-have”.

It’s a must!

And it should be thought of from the very beginning of any project. This is something that Twitter did not think about and many other companies have not done this either.

And to be honest, if you haven’t done that, then you’re gonna have more headaches and you’re gonna waste a lot of time and money trying to add it at a later date or you realise you’ve messed up and you have to fix it, all these things so you are better off thinking about it from the beginning.

And even for this particular situation about audio tweet, I have mentioned many times in the past about the benefit of having the likes of caption and transcript.

There are so many benefit to it and even though in most occasions, accessibility can be beneficial not for the minority but for the majority, for those really needing caption and transcript, there are so many benefit and it’s not just for deaf and hard-of-hearing people.

Yes we spoke up about it but if you check out the link in the description about the benefits of captions and transcript, you’ll realise that so many people benefit from it.

And if so many people benefit from it, then surely Twitter will see it like, “you know what? Because a lot of people will use it, a lot of people will look at the tweet and the videos and if they can access it, then more people will engage with Twitter and they will engage with the tweets and have all these shares and things”.

Surely that’s what Twitter and any software companies, any companies like this, they want people to use their products. Well then, listen to them listen to us, listen to different people. Don’t just leave it at the last minute or at a later stage, you will regret it in the long run.

So hopefully Twitter will take this as a sign to say “you know what? We’ve messed up. Let’s do something about it so that it doesn’t happen again in the future”

And I hope other companies are also learning from this experience so that doesn’t happen to you as well. Because you can see immediately what happened because of this mishap, people have spoken up, they’re not happy about it and they had to put in the extra effort again at a later date to fix it.

You don’t want to do that.

There are so many accessibility experts out there but even so, listen to people on social media, listen to me, talk to me contact me, whatever it is. I’m here if you want to talk about it. But just don’t leave it late.

Don’t leave it as an afterthought. Don’t be doing what Twitter has done, which is basically they’ve messed up and they’ve admitted that, which is great. Right, let’s see what they got to do about it because at the end of the day actions speak louder than words.

Let me know in the comments what do you think about it. Is it a bad thing as I really said? Or does it not matter?

I’m just curious to know what you think, let me know in the comments.

In the meantime, I will speak to you again soon.

Take care!


Share with your friends: on Twitter on Facebook on LinkedIn

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Ahmed Khalifa
Ahmed Khalifa
Founder & Director at Hear Me Out! [CC]
Working on bridging the gap between the hearing and deaf worlds by raising deaf awareness via public speaking, workshops and the contents (blog, podcast and videos) on this site.
Ahmed Khalifa
Latest posts by Ahmed Khalifa (see all)
  • What is ‘audism’? Plus my personal experiences of facing audism - October 27, 2021
  • ‘CODA’ movie review: my thoughts on the latest deaf movie to be released - October 13, 2021
  • Deafness as a ‘hidden/invisible disability’ - October 6, 2021

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: social media, technology

Ahmed Khalifa

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Tony NIcholas says

    June 27, 2020 at 1:37 pm

    Damn you’re right!

    In my last job, they have a policy of access and inclusion. But too often, no thought is gone into how it’s all gonna work EFFECTIVELY.

    My last training session was a webinar, via voice [of course] and it was interactive of sorts. Captions were provided, and these were provided as live captions via a third party.

    The webinar was designed to be used on one screen. But there was a limited number of them, and all I had was the workplace issued laptop. To access the captions, I had to open a separate browser window. So you can imagine the frustrations of flipping between windows to follow the bleeding webinar, let alone try to participate.

    Needless to say I gave them a series of 1’s and 0’s in the evaluation.

    I mean seriously *shaking head*

    Reply
    • Ahmed Khalifa says

      June 28, 2020 at 1:49 pm

      I can’t imagine a lot of people will a) know how to do the process of opening a separate window to get the captions right, b) not everyone will have multiple monitors where they watch what they need on different screens, and c) not everyone will have a big enough screen to be able to comfortable watch both the webinars and captions in in the way that you have described.

      I’m glad you’ve told them your thoughts. It’s important we all do that so that they will (hopefully) learn how to do it better next time.

      Still…it’s a bit frustrating that you’ve had to go through that, Tony.

      Reply
  2. Tony NIcholas says

    June 29, 2020 at 11:24 am

    I have quit my recent job… for many reasons, and one was their inability to actually adapt my working needs during the current corona crisis..I am very good in face to face meetings, but since they moved to phone meetings it was harder for me..and the leadership team did not consider how it will affect me, or if they did, gave no indication in the minutes of meetings…..and buzz calls [phone in meetings from wherever you are working] were a wash out… if my team leader remained the same, I could have gained some traction, but had a change in team leaders and thought, not again…. mate it’s a dispiriting slog

    Reply
    • Ahmed Khalifa says

      June 29, 2020 at 11:43 am

      There comes a point where it’s not possible to put up with whatever is going on at work, especially when it is going against what you need, even when you bring it up and request support. It’s mentally and physically exhausting, plus heartbreaking at times. I can relate to what you’re saying because I’ve been in that situation too. It is a dispiriting slog.

      I really do hope you manage to find and move on to an even bigger and better step, wherever that may be.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Join 500+ Super’EARos to fight barriers together

Join your fellow Super’EARos and help bridge the gap between the deaf and hearing worlds by keeping you up-to-date and receive exclusive content below.

Connect Below

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Topics

Hearing Aids

Sign Language

Subtitles/Captions

Health

Lifestyle

Interviews

Personal

Recent Posts

  • What is ‘audism’? Plus my personal experiences of facing audism
  • ‘CODA’ movie review: my thoughts on the latest deaf movie to be released
  • Deafness as a ‘hidden/invisible disability’
  • Is deafness a disability?
  • Social model vs medical model of disability: What’s the difference?

Footer

Join 500+ Super’EARos to help bridge the gap between the deaf and hearing worlds

Receive the fortnightly ‘The Super’EARo Bulletin’ in your inbox and join other Super’EARos to help the hearing world hear deaf people better while bridge the gaps that are dividing us all.

Follow & Support

  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Support the Website

Free Resources & Guides

Become a Super’EARo

Boring but Important Pages

Disclaimer

Terms & Conditions

Boring But Important Policies

Cookie Policy

Privacy Policy

Defining deaf*

Learn how I define “deaf” here

Copyright © 2023 · Built with StudioPress & Genesis Framework · Run by Ahmed Khalifa and Trading as Khalifa Media Ltd